A high-level plan to ensure reliability, performance, and quality for LeadMagic's email finding and validation API.
Current challenges that this plan addresses to improve service reliability and developer experience.
Staging and production environments share the same databases and caches, risking data corruption and unreliable testing.
Manual deployments are error-prone and slow. There's no CI/CD pipeline to catch issues before they reach production.
When things go wrong, there's no easy way to see what happened. No error tracking, tracing, or dashboards.
No load testing or synthetic monitoring means we discover performance issues only when customers complain.
Without automated code reviews and testing standards, code quality varies and bugs slip through.
Team members follow different processes. No clear rules for branching, reviews, or deployments.
Benefits after implementing this plan
Every code change is tested automatically before it reaches production.
Know about issues in minutes, not hours. Get notified before customers do.
See response times, error rates, and usage patterns in real-time dashboards.
Test confidently in staging without affecting production data.
Every pull request gets automated feedback to catch issues early.
Documented workflows and rules everyone can follow consistently.
Industry-standard tools chosen for reliability and developer experience
Automated testing & deployment
Error tracking & monitoring
Logs, dashboards & alerts
Distributed tracing
Synthetic monitoring
Load & performance testing
AI code reviews
Unit & E2E testing
Team notifications & alerts
Linting & code formatting
What needs to be in place before we start
10 phases over 1-2 weeks to build a complete testing and monitoring suite
Establish clear rules for how code moves from development to production. Create documentation everyone can follow.
Create separate databases and caches for staging and production so testing never affects real customer data.
Set up automated testing and deployment. Every code change gets tested automatically before deployment.
Know about errors the moment they happen. See exactly what went wrong and where in the code.
See the full journey of every request through the system. Identify slow operations and bottlenecks.
Build real-time dashboards showing system health, performance, and costs. Set up alerts for anomalies.
Automated checks that continuously test the API from multiple locations. Know if the service is down globally.
Test how the service performs under heavy traffic. Find the breaking point before customers do.
Every pull request gets reviewed by an AI that catches security issues, bugs, and suggests improvements.
Add coverage requirements and test factories. Ensure critical code paths are always tested.
The critical path that must be followed in order
โ ๏ธ Phases 0-2 must be completed in order. Phases 3-9 can be parallelized.
๐ค AI-Accelerated Timeline
This estimate assumes using Claude AI with tools like Cursor for code generation, configuration, and documentation.
Manual coding: ~5 weeks โ AI-assisted: ~1-2 weeks โจ 3-4x faster
Planned improvements after the initial implementation is stable
Centralized secrets management with version history and audit logs.
When team grows 5+Fully isolated staging database for safer testing and schema changes.
High PriorityGradual rollouts to catch issues before they affect all users.
When incidents increaseToggle features on/off without deployments. Perfect for A/B testing.
When neededShow customers real-time service status and incident history.
SLA requirementsAuto-generated API docs with interactive explorer.
Developer experience